بازنویسی مقاله مربوط به نوروساینس (8401)

Reviewer 3: I still have reservations about the contribution of this paper. The works listed below, for which I have provided links, support my point of view. One of these works addresses exactly the same topic. Consequently, I cannot recommend publication of this paper unless major and significant extensions are made in a convincing manner. I am thus giving the authors one last opportunity. The literature review requires improvement, as key foundational works are overlooked. Is it because they already address this question? Conversely, the bibliography includes numerous references of little relevance. The figure and table titles should be more detailed and informative, making them self-contained and easier to understand independently. The diagram in Fig. 3 appears unrefined, with oversized text that is not suitable for a journal like PRL. A more appropriate software should be used to enhance the quality of this type of diagram. The experimental design is inadequately developed in this paper. A dedicated section should be included to clearly define the number of cases analyzed, their age groups, ethnic backgrounds, etc. Furthermore, the results should consider the impact of age and other factors. Additionally, it would be relevant to investigate which type of music is most effective in influencing case outcomes. Regarding the main experiment, is it reasonable to draw conclusions about the significance of changes in fractal dimension based on only five observations? This number seems insufficient. It is essential to repeat the experiments with a larger sample. Subsequently, hypothesis tests on means and variances are necessary to confirm whether the observed changes are statistically significant. It is also important to compare the Higuchi approach with more recent methods. Finally, the discussion and conclusion add little of substance, which is evident as the paper remains relatively superficial. https://arxiv.org/abs/******* https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/******* https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-*******/html https://journals.lww.com/clinicalneurophys/abstract/2010/10000/fractality_and_a_wavelet_chaos_neural_network.4.aspx https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S******* In view of the comments made, the Associate Editor responsible for your article has decided that the paper can be reconsidered for publication after revision. Therefore we look forward to receiving the revised version of the article as soon as possible, but before Dec 12, 2024(unless the Editor specifies otherwise), together with a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised.